We now have incorporated what we learned into our advisory practice and the design system we use on every engagement. Today, when we help a client prepare disclosure, we’re thinking about the human reader and the algorithm running in the background. The goal is the same content and design telling the same story clearly to both.
That’s what this Thought Piece is about. In the following examples, we are sharing some of the practical, specific things we’ve learned, the kind of tips you can easily apply to board and governance disclosures in your next proxy statement to make them visually compelling and machine-readable. Every idea proposed here is something we build into our own project processes and is EDGAR compatible.
If you’d like a second opinion on where your own disclosures stand beyond these governance examples, we’d be glad to help. We’ll run a no-fee AI-readiness audit on your materials and hand you clear, actionable ideas with no strings attached. Just get in touch!
It’s been a professional thrill to accompany corporations toward better disclosure and stronger outcomes over these sixteen years, and we couldn’t be more excited about what comes next.
A complimentary review of
the AI Legibility of your disclosures
In January 2026, J.P. Morgan Asset Management replaced ISS and Glass Lewis with an in-house AI tool for its US proxy voting. In the Center for Audit Quality’s July 2026 survey, only 2% of institutional investors said they do not use AI when reviewing company filings. Those tools read a document’s text and data layer. They do not read pictures.
What we do. We review your proxy statement, annual report, Form 10-K or sustainability report in the four ways an automated system does and compare the results. Where the methods disagree with one another, that disagreement is the finding. We work only from what is already public: no data, no system access, no time from your team.
What you receive. A written report: what is already clear to AI, what is not, where the document could lead an automated reader to the wrong answer, and a prioritized table of fixes, with precise instructions on how to implement.
The review is complimentary and carries no obligation. Reach out to Iain at poole.i@labrador-company.com and we will do the rest.
Director Nominees Summary Table
Many proxy statements feature an at-a-glance table listing each nominee’s biographical information, independence, and committee memberships.
Board Composition, Tenure, and Diversity
A chart appearing just after the nominees table, intended to summarize the tenure distribution and diversity composition of the Board.
Board Skills Matrix
Many proxy statements feature an at-a-glance table listing each nominee’s biographical information, independence, and committee memberships.
Without a clear understanding of either names or datapoints, the matrix isn’t useful. Although in some cases director biographies list skills individually, mitigating this issue, a machine-readable matrix conveys its meaning through row labels, the column headers, and marks, and if one (or more) are unreadable, the remaining one or two become worthless.
- The “After” matrix is set as a true HTML <table>, so intersections survive. Row label, column header and cell stay bound together, which makes the relationship between the data clear, preserving the communication objective of the matrix.
- Icons, although unreadable to AI, earn their place because they make a page easier and more pleasant for the human reader.
Director Biographies
The individual biography pages for each nominee, combining a rationale for nomination, career history, and a “key skills and expertise” narrative.
The result
- Every fact resolves into a structured record — and, unlike prose, the same record can be built for all eleven directors and compared across companies.
- A machine can now compute tenure, career length and how recent the operating experience is. None of that was possible before.